Just as businesses
compete with other businesses for customers, states compete with other states
for new businesses and jobs. By creating economic climates favorable to
start-ups and business migrations, states benefit from increased investment and
job growth.
But as detailed in the
Tax Foundation's 2012 Business
Tax Climate Index, Maryland
remains one of the nation's least economically competitive states. The Index places Maryland at number 42. That
is, the Index
designates Maryland's system of business taxes as the 8th
worst state in terms of its fostering a favorable business and jobs
climate.
Interstate
tax competition, including business tax competition, is especially important in
difficult economic times, when job creation is most urgently needed. As the State
Business Tax Climate Index explains,
"the Index is an important
and useful tool for policymakers who want to make their states’ tax systems
welcoming to business." Maryland's lawmakers need to take the Index's findings
seriously: the state is long overdue for significant tax reforms improve its
attractiveness to increased financial investment and job creators.
The
State Business Tax Climate Index
is based on five weighted components: state corporate taxes, state individual
income taxes, state sales taxes, state unemployment taxes, and state property
taxes.
Overall,
Maryland ranks 42nd in the Index.
Maryland's bottom-tier status owes in significant part to the poor economic
impact of the state's individual income tax and unemployment insurance tax
systems. Maryland's property tax system is also a serious cause of concern.
In
terms of state individual income taxes, the Index puts Maryland near the cellar, at 46th place. State
individual income taxes have a critically important impact on a given state's
economic competitiveness. According to the Index, "a significant number of businesses, including
sole proprietorships, partnerships and S-corporations, report their income
through the individual income tax code." Also, "[t]axes can have
significant impact on an individual's decision to become a self-employed
entrepreneur." In addition, heavy state income tax burdens reduce the
quantity and the quality of the labor force and raises costs for doing business.
The
Index points to the individual
income tax burdens resulting from states, like Maryland, that permit income
taxes at the municipal and county levels. By calculating an average effective
local option income tax rate for such states, the Index concludes that "Maryland has the highest
average effective local rate, at 1.56 percent of state personal income."
Maryland's poor individual income tax rating is also attributed to its imposing
a marriage penalty on taxpayers filing jointly as well as its double taxation
of capital income – such as ordinary dividends, interest, and cap gains – for
which businesses have already paid taxes.
Maryland
also has one of the worst overall scores for its unemployment insurance tax
system. It ranks 45th in this category. These taxes are paid by employers to
finance benefits for recently unemployed workers. Competitive states have
"rate structures with low minimum and maximum rates and a wage base at the
federal level," along with simpler charging methods. Maryland, however, is
among states with the highest minimum tax rates (2.2%) and the highest maximum
tax rates (13.5%).
And
when it comes to property taxes, Maryland makes a poor showing once more. Out
of 50 states, Maryland has the 40th most economically competitive property tax
system. For Maryland, this low score results substantially from its wide state
property tax base. The state's property taxes include: inventory taxes, real
estate transfer taxes, estate taxes, and inheritance taxes.
Keep
in mind that neighboring states all fare significantly better than Maryland in
the Index's scoring: Delaware
(12th), Pennsylvania (19th), West Virginia (23rd), and Virginia (26th). And the
consequences of Maryland's business unfriendliness have already been observed.
Look no further than Maryland Public Policy Institute's Larry Hogan's May 30,
2012 article, "How Maryland's Tax Rates Are Driving Jobs to Virginia." Citing
another Tax Foundation study, Hogan wrote:
Maryland accounted for the largest taxpayer exodus of any state in the region between 2007 and 2010, with a net migration resulting in 31,000 residents having left the state. Where did most of them go? Virginia. Virginia is now home to nearly 11,500 former Marylanders—a shift of $390 million from the tax rolls of one state to another.
Maryland's
dismal Index ranking should be
another wake-up call to officials and citizens in Maryland. There is urgent
need for tax reforms to make the state's economic atmosphere more conducive to
investment and job growth. For Maryland to continue on its current path means
losing economic opportunities and jobs to neighboring states.