Spectrum is a key input for commercial
wireless broadband services. The FCC has acknowledged there is a shortage of
this valuable resource or "spectrum crunch." This has made federal
spectrum policy a matter of critical importance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a55e/6a55e336dc932837f5947376b2a12b232c682967" alt=""
In the paper, Wallsten lists four
categories of factors impacting the value of spectrum, namely:
- Characteristics of the spectrum license itself, including the geography and population it covers and its frequency;
- Underlying demand for wireless services, for which spectrum is an input;
- Institutional factors including the rules governing each license, such bandwidth size and usage rules; and
- How technological change and innovation affect the extent to which spectrum is a substitute or a complement for other inputs into wireless service provision, such as cell splitting and spectrum sharing.
- [L]icenses with paired spectrum are more valuable than those without, all else equal.
- [U]sage rules affect the value of licenses... Licenses that allow broadband — especially the Broadband-Fixed Wireless combination — are the most valuable. The least valuable are licenses that allow only television broadcasting, followed by licenses that allow only paging. These results are sensible — as services are increasingly all digital and delivered over IP network it makes increasingly less sense to have spectrum devoted to specific (and dying) services.
- [F]lexibility is generally valuable. Licenses that allow broadband are generally flexible —every license (in this database) that allows broadband also allows at least one other use.