On February 25, in an address at the Media Institute, NTIA Administrator Arielle Roth delivered a spirited defense of free speech. Such a defense is always welcome at any time. But now, while America is in the midst of celebrating our 250th birthday, and while, at the same time, there are threats to free speech around the globe, Administrator Roth's address is especially welcome.
To provide a framework for her remarks, Ms. Roth began this way:
"In the 250 years since our founding, technology has repeatedly transformed speech—from the printing press to radio, from the telegraph to the telephone, and from the television to the global internet.
Every major advancement in communications technology has shifted who holds power over speech. In our current age, that increasingly means that whoever controls communications technology controls the boundaries of free expression. Today, that struggle plays out not only at the edge of the network but deep in the infrastructure layers—in spectrum policy, standards bodies, satellite governance, AI systems, and network architecture.
That is also why communications policy—especially international communications policy—is now a central battleground for free speech."
And then this:
"The internet is the most powerful engine of free expression ever created. It amplifies individual voices, dismantles gatekeepers, enables journalists to expose corruption, and helps dissidents organize.
That is no accident. The internet is what it is today because it was built in America under American legal traditions, powered by American ingenuity, and protected by the First Amendment. It rests on principles of openness, decentralization, and a private sector-led model that resists control by any single government or treaty regime."
Having set the stage, the remainder of Ms. Roth's address, with impressive clarity, details some of the threats to free speech from around the world – including from friendly nations that, at times, perversely, justify suppressing speech their governments disfavor in the name of promoting other values or supposed "truths." And she also explains why protection of free speech depends on freedom from government intervention in the various layers or "stacks" of the Internet's architecture.
There's a rich discussion of threats arising from some countries wishing to change the governance model of the ITU in ways that would give the international organization more authority to control speech in individual nations. And a look ahead at technological developments, and policy disputes, in the satellite and wireless areas that will be crucial to maintaining the U.S. global leadership.
