As the Chairman's letter explains, the Jobs Act
requires the Commission to notify NTIA at least 18 months prior to the
commencement of any auction of eligible frequencies. Congress also gave the FCC
until February 2015 to auction the 1695-1710 and 2155-2180 MIHz bands. Wrote the Chairman:
"we include the 1755-1780 MHz band in this notice to preserve the
possibility of auctioning it with the 2155-2180 MHz band."
The Chairman's letter acknowledged an NTIA advisory
committee's proposal for repurposing some of the spectrum at issue from federal
government use to shared governmental and commercial use. But that proposal is
not set in stone. Accordingly, spectrum policymakers
should make all possible efforts to prefer licensing of spectrum on an
exclusive basis over commercial sharing arrangements with government agencies.
Applauding Chairman Genachowski's
letter, Commissioner Ajit Pai drove this point home in a public statement: "I
continue to believe that we should aim to clear and reallocate the 1755–1780
MHz band rather than forcing federal users and commercial operators to
undertake the complicated, untested task of spectrum sharing."
In a Perspectives
from FSF Scholars paper from
earlier this month, I acknowledged the importance of making unlicensed spectrum
available for suitable bands. But at the same time, I concluded that licensing
spectrum for exclusive commercial use is far better than spectrum sharing
arrangements between governmental and commercial users:
Putting repurposed spectrum to its highest commercial use calls for heavy investment by carriers in next-generation wireless broadband networks. The certainty and incentives required for such multi-billion dollar investments are best supplied by spectrum licenses for exclusive use. Arrangements for the private sector and government agencies to share spectrum might be a useful transition tool. But proposals for such sharing now appear prevalent enough that, if adopted, they would undermine the goal of the current undertaking to repurpose spectrum.