
The Chairman's letter acknowledged an NTIA advisory
committee's proposal for repurposing some of the spectrum at issue from federal
government use to shared governmental and commercial use. But that proposal is
not set in stone. Accordingly, spectrum policymakers
should make all possible efforts to prefer licensing of spectrum on an
exclusive basis over commercial sharing arrangements with government agencies.
Applauding Chairman Genachowski's
letter, Commissioner Ajit Pai drove this point home in a public statement: "I
continue to believe that we should aim to clear and reallocate the 1755–1780
MHz band rather than forcing federal users and commercial operators to
undertake the complicated, untested task of spectrum sharing."
In a Perspectives
from FSF Scholars paper from
earlier this month, I acknowledged the importance of making unlicensed spectrum
available for suitable bands. But at the same time, I concluded that licensing
spectrum for exclusive commercial use is far better than spectrum sharing
arrangements between governmental and commercial users:
Putting repurposed spectrum to its highest commercial use calls for heavy investment by carriers in next-generation wireless broadband networks. The certainty and incentives required for such multi-billion dollar investments are best supplied by spectrum licenses for exclusive use. Arrangements for the private sector and government agencies to share spectrum might be a useful transition tool. But proposals for such sharing now appear prevalent enough that, if adopted, they would undermine the goal of the current undertaking to repurpose spectrum.